Straw men and fairy tales: Evaluating reactions to A Natural History of Rape
Palmer CT, Thornhill R.
Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado,
Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA.
J Sex Res. 2003 Aug;40(3):249-55.
ABSTRACTIn this paper we respond to two frequent criticisms of our book, A Natural History of Rape (Thornhill & Palmer, 2000). The first criticism portrays the book as little more than a "just-so story" that human rape is an adaptation. We demonstrate that this portrayal is not accurate. The second criticism reflects a common response to the book s challenge of the popular assertion that rapists are not motivated by sexual desire but instead commit these crimes motivated by the urge to power, domination, and violence, and the urge to degrade and humiliate women. We demonstrate that such criticisms of our book are inherently contradictory and illogical. We believe it is important for sex researchers to understand that these sorts of criticisms are seriously flawed so that future research efforts toward understanding the causes of sexual coercion are not stalled.Liberal Eugenics
Brain size/human evolution
Selecting potential children
Alzheimer's disease: resources
Transhumanism/Brave New World?
Francis Galton and contemporary eugenics
Gene therapy and performance enhancement
Preimplantation genetics and stem cell therapy
Cathepsin D, HLA-DRB1 and APO and intelligence
Institute for Germinal Choice ('Genius Sperm Bank')
and further reading
The Good Drug Guide
The Abolitionist Project
The Hedonistic Imperative
The Reproductive Revolution
MDMA: Utopian Pharmacology
Critique of Huxley's Brave New World